Reading · Performance

What is a good ROAS for Meta and Google ads in India?

7 min read

A good ROAS for Meta and Google ads in India in 2026 is roughly 2.5x to 4x for most D2C and ecommerce brands, with 3x a healthy target and strong accounts pushing past 4x. Google Search usually shows a higher ROAS on high-intent keywords, while Meta earns its keep on discovery and new-customer growth. Lead-gen businesses like real estate should track cost per qualified lead instead of ROAS.

There is no single good ROAS for Meta and Google ads in India. A good ROAS is simply one that sits comfortably above your break-even, and your break-even is set by your margins, not by an industry benchmark. A 2x can be excellent for one business and loss-making for another.

Why a good ROAS depends on your margins, not an industry benchmark.

Start from your break-even

Before chasing a number, work out the ROAS at which you stop losing money. The quick rule is break-even ROAS is about one divided by your gross margin. Anything above that is profit; anything below is subsidised sales. Here is how that plays out:

Gross margin	Break-even ROAS	A healthy target
20%	5.0x	6x and above
33%	3.0x	4x and above
40%	2.5x	3x and above
50%	2.0x	2.5x and above
60%	1.7x	2x and above

So a brand on 50% margins can scale happily at 2.5x, while a 20%-margin business needs 6x just to breathe. Same platform, very different good number.

Judge blended ROAS, not platform-reported

Both Meta and Google over-report, because they each claim credit for the same sales and lean on view-through and branded search. The honest measure is blended ROAS: total revenue divided by total ad spend across channels. If platform ROAS looks great but blended is flat, the platforms are claiming sales you would have got anyway.

Blendedtotal revenue divided by total ad spend is the truth

New vs oldnew-customer ROAS matters more than blended for growth

Paybackwith repeat buyers, judge on 60-90 day payback, not day one

New customers and payback

For brands with repeat purchase, day-one ROAS understates the truth. What matters is new-customer acquisition cost against lifetime value, and how fast you pay it back. A 1.5x on the first order can be a great deal if that customer buys three more times. This is where performance marketing stops being about a single number and becomes about unit economics.

Set your ROAS target properly

Calculate break-even ROAS as roughly 1 divided by gross margin
Track blended ROAS across all channels, not platform-reported
Separate new-customer ROAS from returning-customer sales
For repeat-purchase brands, judge on 60-90 day payback
Set prospecting and retargeting targets separately

So what is a good ROAS? One that clears your break-even with room to spare, holds up on a blended basis, and acquires new customers you can pay back. Chase that, not a benchmark someone quoted from a different business with different margins.

Key takeaways

A healthy target is around 3x; 4x or more is strong for Indian D2C and ecommerce
Google Search shows higher last-click ROAS; Meta drives new customers
Track blended ROAS and new-customer acquisition, not one dashboard
Real estate and lead-gen should use cost per qualified lead
Creative and tracking lift ROAS more than bid tweaks

Frequently asked questions

Is a 2x ROAS good or bad?

It depends on your margins. For a high-margin D2C brand 2x may be near break-even, while for others it is profitable. Know your contribution margin before judging any ROAS number.

What ROAS should a new brand expect?

Early on, focus on finding winning creative and clean tracking. Blended ROAS often starts around 1.5x to 2x and climbs as the account matures over two to three months.

Why is my Meta ROAS lower than Google?

Because they do different jobs. Google captures existing intent; Meta creates demand and acquires new customers. Compare each to its own benchmark and look at blended results.